Verify Evidence Pack Integrity

Check that Postal.id evidence packs haven't been tampered with using SHA-256 hash verification. See anonymised case details to confirm authenticity.

Get started

Enter your details to verify up to 3 evidence pack hashes for free.

1

Find the hash

Every Postal.id Evidence Pack PDF contains a SHA-256 hash in its footer.

2

Paste and verify

Paste the hash above. We check it against our cryptographic records.

3

Confirm authenticity

See anonymised case details confirming the document is genuine and unaltered.

    Help Reference

    110 entries available

    Dashboard Overview

    Total Cases

    Description

    The total number of verification cases created across all statuses. Includes active, completed, failed, and expired cases.

    Impact

    Tracks overall verification volume and platform adoption. Spikes may indicate batch uploads or new client onboarding.

    Example

    Displayed as a number, e.g. "247". Includes all cases regardless of status (active, completed, failed, expired).

    Benchmark

    Typical tenants process 50-500 cases/month depending on plan.

    Pro Tips

    • Use batch CSV upload for high-volume onboarding periods.
    • Monitor for unexpected spikes which may indicate API misuse.

    Completed

    Description

    Cases that have reached the COMPLETE terminal state — all required verification layers passed successfully.

    Impact

    Directly measures successful verifications. A low completed count relative to total cases suggests drop-off in the verification funnel.

    Example

    Displayed as a number, e.g. "189". Only counts cases with status = COMPLETE.

    Benchmark

    Healthy completion rates are 70-85% of total cases.

    Formula

    Count of cases where status = COMPLETE

    Pro Tips

    • Send reminders to subjects with pending verifications.
    • Review failed cases to identify common blockers.

    In Transit

    Description

    Cases where a postal letter has been dispatched but not yet delivered or verified. Status is POSTAL_DISPATCHED.

    Impact

    High in-transit counts may indicate postal delays or delivery issues in certain regions.

    Example

    Displayed as a number, e.g. "34". Counts cases with status = POSTAL_DISPATCHED.

    Benchmark

    UK letters: 1-3 business days. EU/US: 3-7 business days.

    Letters in transit for more than 10 business days may indicate delivery failure.

    Pro Tips

    • Check delivery tracking for stuck letters.
    • Consider re-dispatching if beyond expected delivery window.

    Success Rate

    Description

    Percentage of cases that reached COMPLETE status out of all cases that have reached a terminal state (COMPLETE, FAILED, or EXPIRED).

    Impact

    The primary health metric for your verification process. Low success rates may indicate issues with subject engagement, postal delivery, or bundle configuration.

    Example

    Displayed as a percentage, e.g. "82.5%". If 165 of 200 terminal cases completed, rate = 82.5%.

    Benchmark

    75-90% is healthy. Below 60% warrants investigation.

    Formula

    COMPLETE / (COMPLETE + FAILED + EXPIRED) x 100

    Success rate excludes in-progress cases. A high total with low terminal count means most cases are still active.

    Pro Tips

    • Enable automated reminders to improve completion.
    • Review expired cases — shorter TTLs increase expiry rates.

    Case Lifecycle

    CREATED

    Description

    Initial state when a case is first created. No verification actions have been taken yet.

    Impact

    Cases should move out of CREATED quickly. A backlog here means digital verification or letter dispatch is delayed.

    Example

    Input: Subject name "Jane Smith", address "12 Baker Street, London, NW1 6XE, GB", email "jane@example.com". Output: Case created with status CREATED.

    Pro Tips

    • Automate dispatch to avoid cases sitting in CREATED.

    DIGITAL_PENDING

    Description

    Email and/or SMS OTP has been sent to the subject. Waiting for them to enter the code.

    Impact

    Long dwell times suggest the subject did not receive the OTP or is not engaging.

    Example

    Email OTP sent: "A3K9X2MF" (8 characters). SMS OTP sent: "482917" (6 digits). Subject enters the code on the verification page.

    Benchmark

    Most digital verifications complete within 5 minutes of sending.

    Pro Tips

    • Check for disposable email addresses causing delivery failures.
    • SMS delivery rates vary by carrier — monitor bounce rates.

    DIGITAL_VERIFIED

    Description

    Subject has successfully entered the correct email/SMS OTP. Digital layer is complete.

    Impact

    If the bundle includes postal verification, the case will transition to POSTAL_DISPATCHED next.

    Example

    Subject entered "A3K9X2MF" correctly. Status transitions from DIGITAL_PENDING to DIGITAL_VERIFIED.

    POSTAL_DISPATCHED

    Description

    A physical letter with a unique 10-character OTP and QR code has been printed and dispatched via the postal provider.

    Impact

    Delivery tracking is available for UK and US/Canada (tracked delivery).

    Example

    Letter dispatched with postal OTP "K7M2X9P4LR" (10 characters) and QR code linking to verification URL. Tracking reference: "TRK12345678".

    Benchmark

    UK: 1-3 days. EU/US: 3-7 days.

    POSTAL_PENDING

    Description

    Letter has been confirmed delivered (via tracking) but the subject has not yet entered the postal OTP.

    Impact

    The subject has the letter but has not acted. A reminder may help.

    Example

    Tracking shows "Delivered" on 2026-02-20. Subject has not yet entered OTP "K7M2X9P4LR". Reminder email scheduled.

    Pro Tips

    • Enable automated reminders for postal-pending cases.
    • QR code on the letter makes verification faster — mention this to subjects.

    POSTAL_VERIFIED

    Description

    Subject has entered the correct postal OTP. Physical address possession is confirmed.

    Impact

    The case will now transition to COMPLETE (assuming all required layers are verified).

    Example

    Subject entered "K7M2X9P4LR" correctly via QR scan or manual entry. Address possession confirmed.

    COMPLETE

    Description

    All required verification layers have been successfully completed. Evidence pack is sealed with SHA-256 hash chain.

    Impact

    Terminal state. The evidence pack is now available for download and webhook delivery.

    Example

    Case completed with assurance level "Verified (Digital + Postal)". Evidence pack PDF available for download. Webhook "case.completed" fired.

    Completed cases cannot be re-opened. Create a new case if re-verification is needed.

    FAILED

    Description

    Case failed due to max OTP attempts exceeded, fraud detection, or manual rejection by a caseworker.

    Impact

    Terminal state. Review the case timeline for the specific failure reason.

    Example

    Reason: "Max OTP attempts exceeded (5/5 for postal layer)". Or: "Caseworker rejected — ghost address confirmed".

    Failed cases count against your verification quota.

    Pro Tips

    • Check risk signals — disposable emails and ghost addresses are common causes.
    • Cases can be failed manually from MANUAL_REVIEW status.

    EXPIRED

    Description

    Case exceeded its time-to-live (TTL) without completing all required verification layers.

    Impact

    Terminal state. The subject did not complete verification within the allowed window.

    Example

    Case created 2026-01-15 with 30-day TTL. Expired on 2026-02-14 with status stuck at POSTAL_PENDING.

    Benchmark

    Default TTL is 30 days. Adjust per bundle if needed.

    Pro Tips

    • Increase TTL for international postal verifications.
    • Send reminders before expiry to improve completion rates.

    Assurance Levels

    Assurance Level

    Description

    Shows exactly which verification layers were completed for a case. Each layer is listed individually: Email, SMS, Postal, and Geo. For example, "Email + SMS + Postal" means all three channels were verified.

    Impact

    More layers = stronger assurance. Cases including Postal prove physical address possession. Cases including Geo prove physical presence at the address during verification.

    Example

    "Email + Postal": email OTP + postal letter verified. "Email + SMS + Postal + Geo": all four layers verified — maximum assurance.

    Benchmark

    Regulated industries (law, finance, accountancy) typically require at least Email + Postal.

    Pro Tips

    • Use the Enhanced bundle for Email + SMS + Postal.
    • Use the Maximum bundle for all four layers including Geo.

    Risk & Fraud

    Risk Score

    Description

    Composite fraud risk score from 0-100 calculated at case creation. Higher scores indicate greater risk.

    Impact

    Determines whether risk-based step-up is triggered. Cases above the threshold are automatically escalated from digital to postal verification.

    Example

    Score 15: Low risk (no signals). Score 45: Medium (disposable email detected). Score 75: High (ghost address + velocity + disposable email).

    Benchmark

    0-30: Low risk. 30-60: Medium risk. 60+: High risk (step-up likely).

    Formula

    Weighted sum of individual risk signals (disposable email, ghost address, address velocity, etc.)

    Pro Tips

    • Configure step-up threshold in tenant settings.
    • Review high-risk cases manually even if they complete.

    Verification Strength

    Description

    The overall verification confidence score (0-100%) assigned when a case completes. Combines results from all verification layers: email OTP, SMS OTP, geolocation proximity, postal letter redemption, and address quality checks.

    Impact

    Higher scores indicate stronger proof of address. This score decays over time (see Reverification). Cases with low strength may warrant additional verification.

    Example

    Score 83%: Strong (postal + digital + geo all passed). Score 68%: Good (postal + digital passed, no geo). Score 35%: Weak (digital only, partial checks).

    Benchmark

    70-100%: Strong verification. 40-69%: Moderate. Below 40%: Weak — consider re-verification.

    Formula

    Sum of layer scores: Email (10), SMS (10), Geo proximity (up to 20), Postal (25), Address quality (up to 15), minus penalties for risk signals.

    Pro Tips

    • Use Digital+Postal bundles for the highest strength scores.
    • Geolocation adds up to 20 points when the subject verifies near the claimed address.

    Disposable Email

    Description

    Detected when the subject email address belongs to a known disposable/temporary email provider (e.g. Guerrilla Mail, Tempail).

    Impact

    Strong fraud indicator. Disposable emails cannot receive follow-up communications and suggest intent to avoid accountability.

    Example

    Input email: "user@guerrillamail.com" or "temp@throwaway.email". Signal triggers: Disposable Email = true, +25 risk points.

    Contributes 25 points to the risk score by default.

    Pro Tips

    • Consider requiring postal verification for all cases with disposable emails.

    Ghost Address

    Description

    Address matches a known mail forwarding service, virtual office, PO box farm, or serviced office address.

    Impact

    The subject may not physically reside or operate at this address. Letters will be received but do not prove actual occupancy.

    Example

    Input address: "71-75 Shelton Street, London, WC2H 9JQ" (known virtual office). Signal triggers: Ghost Address = true.

    Ghost addresses undermine the core promise of postal verification. Always investigate.

    Pro Tips

    • Cross-reference with business registration records.
    • Consider requiring in-person verification for ghost addresses.

    Mail Forwarding

    Description

    Address is associated with a mail forwarding or redirection service (e.g. postal redirection service, PO Box).

    Impact

    Mail forwarding means the letter could be received at a different physical location than the claimed address.

    Example

    Input address: "PO Box 4521, Manchester, M60 3AT" or an address with an active postal redirect. Signal: Mail Forwarding = true.

    Forwarded mail breaks the proof-of-address chain. The letter arrives but not necessarily at the claimed address.

    Address Velocity

    Description

    Multiple cases for different subjects have been submitted with the same address within a rolling time window.

    Impact

    Could indicate a legitimate shared address (e.g. office building) or a fraud pattern where one address is used for multiple fake identities.

    Example

    5 different subjects verified at "42 High Street, Bristol, BS1 2AW" in the past 7 days. Velocity signal triggered.

    Benchmark

    1-2 cases per address per month is normal. 5+ within a week is suspicious.

    Pro Tips

    • Cross-reference with subject names to identify legitimate shared offices.
    • Set velocity thresholds in fraud configuration.

    Cross-Tenant

    Description

    The same address has appeared in verification cases across different tenants on the platform.

    Impact

    May indicate an address being used to fraudulently verify across multiple regulated firms simultaneously.

    Example

    "10 Downing Street, London" verified by 3 different tenants in the past 30 days. Cross-tenant signal raised (tenant names anonymised).

    Cross-tenant signals are anonymised — you see the signal but not the other tenant's details.

    IP Mismatch

    Description

    The IP address used during digital verification geolocates to a region significantly different from the claimed postal address.

    Impact

    May indicate the subject is not near the claimed address. However, VPN usage can produce false positives.

    Example

    Claimed address: London, UK. Verification IP: 203.0.113.45 (geolocated to Lagos, Nigeria). Mismatch distance: 4,900 km.

    IP geolocation is approximate — do not use as sole rejection criteria.

    Pro Tips

    • Combine with geo-location layer for stronger physical presence confirmation.

    Step-Up

    Description

    Automatic escalation from a digital-only verification bundle to include postal verification, triggered when the risk score exceeds the configured threshold.

    Impact

    Ensures high-risk cases get physical address verification even when the original bundle was digital-only.

    Example

    Case created with "Basic" bundle (email only). Risk score = 72 (above threshold 60). Postal layer automatically added. Step-Up badge shown.

    Benchmark

    Default step-up threshold is 60 (configurable per tenant).

    Pro Tips

    • Monitor step-up rates — very high rates may mean your threshold is too low.
    • Step-up adds postal cost; factor this into billing estimates.

    Verification Bundles

    Email Layer

    Description

    Sends an 8-character OTP code to the subject's email address for verification.

    Impact

    Fast digital verification — most subjects complete within minutes. Validates email ownership but not physical address.

    Example

    Input: subject email "jane.smith@lawfirm.co.uk". Output: OTP "A3K9X2MF" sent via configured email template.

    Benchmark

    Delivery rate: 98%+ for legitimate email addresses. Completion rate: 85-95%.

    Pro Tips

    • Customise the email template with your branding via Template Engine.
    • Check bounce rates — high bounces suggest invalid email data.

    SMS Layer

    Description

    Sends a 6-digit OTP code via SMS to the subject's mobile number.

    Impact

    Validates phone number ownership. Higher engagement than email due to push notification.

    Example

    Input: subject phone "+44 7700 900123". Output: SMS with OTP "482917" sent. Subject enters code on verification page.

    Benchmark

    Delivery rate: 95-99% depending on carrier. Completion rate: 90%+.

    SMS costs are per-message and vary by country. International SMS is more expensive.

    Pro Tips

    • Use as a complement to email, not a replacement — some subjects prefer email.

    Postal Layer

    Description

    Dispatches a physical letter with a unique 10-character OTP and QR code to the subject's claimed address.

    Impact

    The core Postal.id verification — proves physical possession of the address. Unfakeable by digital means.

    Example

    Input: "12 Baker Street, London, NW1 6XE". Letter printed with OTP "K7M2X9P4LR" + QR code. Dispatched via tracked post.

    Benchmark

    UK delivery: 1-3 days. Completion rate: 70-85% (dependent on subject engagement).

    Postal verification is slower and more expensive than digital. Use for higher-assurance requirements.

    Pro Tips

    • Enable QR code scanning to simplify the subject experience.
    • Customise the letter template with your branding.

    Geo Layer

    Description

    Captures GPS coordinates from the subject's device at the time of OTP entry. Compares with the claimed address location.

    Impact

    Adds a physical presence confirmation. The subject must be near the claimed address when entering the postal OTP.

    Example

    Claimed address: 51.5074, -0.1278 (London). Subject GPS: 51.5081, -0.1290 (0.15 km away). Within 1 km radius: PASS.

    Requires location permissions from the subject's browser. Some may decline.

    Pro Tips

    • Configure the acceptable radius (default: 1km) based on your needs.
    • Urban areas may need a smaller radius; rural areas may need larger.

    TTL (Time to Live)

    Description

    Maximum number of days allowed for the subject to complete all required verification layers before the case expires.

    Impact

    Shorter TTLs create urgency but increase expiry rates. Longer TTLs are more lenient but delay case resolution.

    Example

    Input: 30 (days). Case created 2026-02-01 will expire 2026-03-03 if not completed. Enter 7-60 depending on use case.

    Benchmark

    Default: 30 days. For urgent verifications, 7-14 days. For international postal, 45-60 days.

    Pro Tips

    • Match TTL to the expected postal delivery time in the target country.
    • Send reminders at 50% and 80% of TTL elapsed.

    Max Attempts

    Description

    Maximum number of OTP entry attempts allowed per verification layer before the case is marked as failed.

    Impact

    Prevents brute-force OTP guessing. Too few attempts frustrate legitimate subjects; too many weaken security.

    Example

    Input: 5. Subject enters wrong OTP 5 times → case fails. Enter 3-10 (recommended: 5 for standard, 3 for high security).

    Benchmark

    Default: 5 attempts. Security-sensitive: 3 attempts.

    Formula

    After max attempts exhausted → case status transitions to FAILED.

    Each failed attempt is logged in the audit trail and may contribute to risk scoring.

    Letter Format

    Description

    The postal format used for dispatching verification letters. Options depend on the provider and destination country.

    Impact

    Different formats have different costs, delivery speeds, and tracking capabilities.

    Example

    Options: "standard" (cheapest, no tracking), "tracked" (mid-range, delivery confirmation), "certified" (signature required).

    Pro Tips

    • Standard letter: cheapest, no tracking. Tracked letter: mid-range, delivery confirmation. Certified mail: most expensive, signature required.

    Required vs Optional

    Description

    Each verification layer in a bundle can be marked as required or optional. Required layers must be completed; optional layers enhance assurance if completed.

    Impact

    Required layers determine the minimum assurance level. Optional layers provide additional confidence without blocking completion.

    Example

    Bundle config: Email = Required, SMS = Optional, Postal = Required, Geo = Optional. Subject must complete email + postal; SMS and geo are bonus.

    Pro Tips

    • Make postal required for regulated use cases.
    • Make geo optional to avoid blocking subjects who decline location permissions.

    Postal Delivery

    Delivery Rate

    Description

    Percentage of dispatched letters that were successfully delivered to the destination address.

    Impact

    Low delivery rates may indicate address quality issues, incorrect postcodes, or regional postal problems.

    Example

    96 of 100 letters delivered = 96% delivery rate. Displayed as a percentage on the postal metrics card.

    Benchmark

    UK: 98%+. EU: 95-98%. US: 97%+.

    Formula

    Delivered / Dispatched x 100

    Pro Tips

    • Validate addresses before dispatching.
    • Monitor delivery rates by country to identify regional issues.

    Return Rate

    Description

    Percentage of dispatched letters returned to sender (RTS) by the postal service.

    Impact

    High return rates indicate invalid addresses, subjects who have moved, or incorrect address formatting.

    Example

    3 of 100 letters returned = 3% return rate. Common reasons: "addressee gone away", "insufficient address".

    Benchmark

    Healthy: below 3%. Above 5% warrants address validation review.

    Formula

    Returned / Dispatched x 100

    Returns add cost (dispatch + return postage) with no verification value.

    Avg Delivery Days

    Description

    Average number of business days between letter dispatch and confirmed delivery (where tracking is available).

    Impact

    Helps set realistic TTL values and subject expectations.

    Example

    Displayed as "1.8 days" for UK, "4.2 days" for EU. Based on tracked deliveries in your recent cases.

    Benchmark

    UK: 1.5 days. EU: 4-5 days. US: 3-4 days.

    QR Scan Rate

    Description

    Percentage of postal verifications completed by scanning the QR code on the letter versus manually typing the OTP.

    Impact

    Higher QR scan rates indicate good subject experience — scanning is faster and less error-prone.

    Example

    55 of 100 postal verifications used QR scan = 55%. Remaining 45% typed the 10-character OTP manually.

    Benchmark

    Typical: 40-60% use QR scanning.

    Pro Tips

    • Mention QR scanning in subject communications to increase adoption.

    Address Alerts

    Address Velocity Signal

    Description

    Alert triggered when an address receives more verification cases than the configured threshold within a time window.

    Impact

    May indicate legitimate shared occupancy or potential fraud via address reuse.

    Example

    Alert: "42 High Street, Bristol" — 5 cases in 7 days (threshold: 3 per 30 days). Investigate shared office or fraud.

    Benchmark

    Default threshold: 3 cases per address per 30 days.

    Pro Tips

    • Acknowledge alerts after investigation to keep the list manageable.
    • Adjust thresholds based on your client demographics.

    Cross-Tenant Signal

    Description

    Alert triggered when the same address is being verified across multiple different tenants on the platform.

    Impact

    Could indicate a professional fraud attempt spanning multiple regulated firms.

    Example

    Alert: "10 Downing Street, London" appears in 3 different tenants within 30 days. Other tenant names are anonymised.

    Cross-tenant details are anonymised for data protection. You see the signal, not the other tenant's case details.

    Alert Score

    Description

    Numerical severity score assigned to each address alert based on the type and frequency of signals detected.

    Impact

    Higher scores warrant more urgent investigation. Used for prioritising the alert queue.

    Example

    Score 15 (low): single velocity signal. Score 45 (medium): velocity + ghost address. Score 80 (high): cross-tenant + velocity + forwarding.

    Benchmark

    1-30: Low priority. 30-60: Medium. 60+: High priority — investigate immediately.

    Acknowledge

    Description

    Mark an alert as reviewed after investigation. Acknowledged alerts are moved out of the active queue.

    Impact

    Helps team members track which alerts have been investigated versus which need attention.

    Example

    Click "Acknowledge" on an alert → add a note like "Confirmed shared office building, legitimate usage". Alert moves to resolved queue.

    Pro Tips

    • Add a note when acknowledging to document your investigation findings.
    • Acknowledged alerts remain in the audit trail permanently.

    Webhooks

    Webhook Events

    Description

    Real-time HTTP POST notifications sent to your configured endpoint when case status changes occur.

    Impact

    Enables automated workflows — update your CRM, trigger follow-up actions, or sync verification status with your systems.

    Example

    Events: case.created, case.digital_verified, case.postal_dispatched, case.postal_verified, case.completed, case.failed, case.expired, letter.dispatched, letter.delivered

    Pro Tips

    • Subscribe only to events you need to reduce noise.
    • Use case.completed for most integration use cases.

    HMAC-SHA256 Signature

    Description

    Every webhook request includes an X-Postal-Id-Signature header containing an HMAC-SHA256 hash of the request body using your webhook secret.

    Impact

    Verify this signature before processing to ensure the webhook came from Postal.id and was not tampered with.

    Example

    Header: "X-Postal-Id-Signature: sha256=a1b2c3d4e5...". Verify by computing HMAC-SHA256(your_secret, raw_body) and comparing.

    Formula

    HMAC-SHA256(webhook_secret, request_body)

    Never process webhooks without verifying the signature — this is a critical security control.

    Retry Behaviour

    Description

    Failed webhook deliveries (non-2xx response or timeout) are retried with exponential backoff up to 5 attempts.

    Impact

    Ensures temporary outages on your side do not cause missed events.

    Example

    Retry delays: ~30s, ~2min, ~8min, ~30min, ~2hr (exponential backoff with jitter)

    After 5 failed attempts, the webhook is marked as failed. Check the webhook logs to identify persistent failures.

    Billing & Usage

    Plan Limit

    Description

    Maximum number of verification cases included in your current subscription plan per billing period.

    Impact

    Cases beyond the plan limit may incur overage charges or be blocked depending on your plan settings.

    Example

    Performance plan: "87 / 100 cases used this period". At 100, new case creation may be blocked until next period.

    Benchmark

    Essential: 25/month. Performance: 100/month. Enterprise: unlimited.

    Pro Tips

    • Monitor usage at 80% of limit to avoid disruptions.
    • Upgrade plan before hitting limits for uninterrupted service.

    Usage Period

    Description

    The current billing cycle during which verification cases are counted against your plan limit.

    Impact

    Case counts reset at the start of each billing period.

    Example

    Displayed as "1 Feb 2026 — 28 Feb 2026". Cases created within this window count toward the limit.

    Plan Status

    Description

    Current state of your subscription: active, past_due, cancelled, or trialing.

    Impact

    Verification capabilities may be restricted for past_due or cancelled plans.

    Example

    Values: "active" (normal), "trialing" (free trial), "past_due" (payment failed), "cancelled" (subscription ended).

    Past-due accounts have a grace period before case creation is blocked.

    Verification Funnel

    Funnel Overview

    Description

    Visual breakdown of cases at each stage of the verification lifecycle, showing where subjects progress and where they drop off.

    Impact

    Identify bottlenecks — if many cases stall at POSTAL_PENDING, subjects are receiving letters but not entering codes.

    Example

    Created: 100 → Digital Verified: 85 → Postal Dispatched: 80 → Postal Verified: 65 → Complete: 62 → Failed: 8 → Expired: 15.

    Pro Tips

    • Focus improvement efforts on the stage with the largest drop-off.
    • Compare funnel shapes across different verification bundles.

    Manual Review

    Description

    Cases escalated from the automated flow for human review. Typically due to risk signals, edge cases, or caseworker discretion.

    Impact

    Manual review cases require a caseworker to approve or reject. They do not auto-complete.

    Example

    Case escalated due to risk score 85 + ghost address. Caseworker reviews evidence, clicks "Approve" (→ COMPLETE) or "Reject" (→ FAILED).

    Pro Tips

    • Set up notifications for new manual review cases to reduce response time.
    • Document review decisions in case notes for audit trail.

    Batch Upload

    Batch Upload

    Description

    Create multiple verification cases at once by uploading a CSV file. The system validates every row, flags errors, checks for duplicates, and processes valid rows in parallel.

    Impact

    Enables bulk onboarding — process hundreds of verification cases from a single file upload instead of creating them one by one.

    Example

    Upload "clients_q1.csv" with 50 rows → Validate → 47 valid, 2 invalid, 1 duplicate → Upload 47 cases → Cases created and digital OTPs sent.

    Pro Tips

    • Always validate before uploading to catch errors early.
    • Download the template CSV for the correct column format.

    CSV Format

    Description

    Your CSV must include these required columns: name (subject's full name), email (for notifications and digital OTP), line1 (street address), city, postalCode, countryCode (2-letter ISO code e.g. GB, US, DE). Optional columns: phone (with country prefix e.g. +44), line2, region, reference (your internal ID), bundleId (1 = Basic, 2 = Standard, 3 = Enhanced, 4 = Maximum).

    Impact

    Correct CSV formatting ensures maximum validation success. Missing required columns will cause row-level errors.

    Example

    Header row: name,email,phone,line1,line2,city,region,postalCode,countryCode,reference,bundleId Data row: Jane Smith,jane@example.com,+447700900123,12 Baker Street,,London,,NW1 6XE,GB,MATTER-001,3

    Using "UK" instead of "GB" is the most common error. The correct ISO code for United Kingdom is "GB".

    Pro Tips

    • Download the CSV template from the batch upload page for guaranteed correct format.
    • Use 2-letter ISO country codes: GB (not UK), US, DE, FR, NL, IE, ES, IT, CA, AU.
    • Phone numbers must include country prefix (e.g. +44 for UK, +1 for US).
    • bundleId is optional (1 = Basic, 2 = Standard, 3 = Enhanced, 4 = Maximum). If omitted, the bundle selected in the dropdown applies. If provided per row, it overrides the dropdown.

    CSV Validation

    Description

    Before uploading, click "Preview & Validate" to check your file. The system checks: required fields present, valid email format, valid country codes, address completeness, and duplicate detection against existing cases.

    Impact

    Validation catches errors before cases are created, saving time and avoiding wasted postal costs on invalid addresses.

    Example

    Validation results: Total Rows: 50, Valid: 47 (green), Invalid: 2 (red), Duplicates: 1 (amber). Country breakdown: GB: 30, US: 15, DE: 5.

    Pro Tips

    • Fix invalid rows and re-upload — only valid rows will be processed.
    • Duplicates are detected by matching name + address against existing active cases.

    Validation Errors

    Description

    Common errors: "Missing required field" (name/line1/city/postalCode/countryCode is blank), "Invalid country code" (not a recognised 2-letter ISO code), "Invalid email format" (malformed email), "Duplicate" (same name+address already exists as an active case).

    Impact

    Each error shows the row number, field name, and error message so you can fix the exact issue in your CSV.

    Example

    Row 15: postalCode — "Missing required field". Row 23: countryCode — "Invalid country code 'UK' (expected 'GB')". Row 31: name — "Duplicate of row 12 (Jane Smith, 12 Baker Street)".

    Pro Tips

    • Check postcode format matches the target country (UK: "SW1A 2AA", US: "10001" or "10001-1234").
    • Remove duplicate rows before uploading.

    Upload Results

    Description

    After validation, you'll see: Total Rows (all rows in CSV), Valid (ready to upload), Invalid (have errors — fix and re-upload), Duplicates (match existing active cases — skipped). Only valid rows are processed when you click Upload.

    Impact

    Invalid and duplicate rows are skipped. You can download a report of failed rows to fix and re-upload separately.

    Example

    Click "Upload 47 Cases" → system creates 47 verification cases in parallel. Each case gets digital OTPs sent immediately. Postal letters dispatched based on bundle config.

    Batch Job Status

    Description

    After upload, each batch job shows a status: Processing (still creating cases), Complete (all rows processed), Failed (system error during processing). The progress bar shows Succeeded/Failed/Remaining counts.

    Impact

    Monitor batch progress in real-time. Most batches complete within minutes.

    Example

    Batch "clients_q1.csv": 47/47 processed, 45 succeeded, 2 failed. Click "View Errors" to see which rows failed.

    Pro Tips

    • Failed rows can be retried without re-uploading the entire file.
    • Download the error report CSV for failed rows with detailed error messages.

    Error Report

    Description

    Click "View Errors" on a completed batch to see which rows failed and why. Click "Download Report" to get a CSV of failed rows with error details — fix the errors and re-upload just those rows. "Retry Failed" re-processes failed rows without re-uploading.

    Impact

    Efficiently handle partial failures without re-processing the entire batch.

    Example

    Error report: Row 12 — "Address validation failed: undeliverable address". Row 38 — "Plan limit exceeded". Fix address in row 12, upgrade plan, then retry.

    Quick Actions

    New Case

    Description

    Opens the case creation form where you enter the subject's details, address, and select a verification bundle. Once submitted, digital OTPs are sent immediately and a postal letter is dispatched (if the bundle includes postal verification).

    Impact

    The primary way to start a single address verification. For bulk verifications, use Batch Upload instead.

    Example

    Click "New Case" → fill in name, email, address → select "Enhanced" bundle → click "Create Case" → email OTP sent within seconds, letter dispatched within 1 hour.

    Pro Tips

    • Use address autocomplete for faster, more accurate address entry.
    • Select the right bundle upfront — changing it later requires creating a new case.

    Recipients

    Description

    View all subjects (people being verified) across all your cases. Search by name, email, phone, or address. Click any recipient to see their full verification history, risk signals, and address changes over time.

    Impact

    Central directory of all people you've ever verified. Useful for re-verification, fraud investigation, and compliance audits.

    Example

    Search "Jane Smith" → see all cases for that person → click through to view detailed profile with verification history, risk signals, and address timeline.

    Batch Upload

    Description

    Create multiple verification cases at once by uploading a CSV file. The system validates every row, flags errors, checks for duplicates against existing cases, and processes valid rows in parallel.

    Impact

    Essential for high-volume onboarding. Process hundreds of verifications from a single file instead of creating cases one by one.

    Example

    Prepare CSV with columns: name, line1, city, postalCode, countryCode (required) + email, phone, reference (optional) → Upload → Validate → Process.

    Pro Tips

    • Download the CSV template first for the correct column format.
    • Always validate before uploading to catch formatting errors.

    Verification Packages

    Basic Package

    Description

    Digital-only verification using email OTP. An 8-character OTP code is sent to the subject's email address. The subject enters the code to verify email ownership. Fastest completion time (~5 minutes). TTL (Time To Live) defines how long each OTP code remains valid before expiring — e.g. "30m TTL" means the code expires after 30 minutes.

    Impact

    Assurance level: Verified (Digital). Suitable for low-risk onboarding where email confirmation is sufficient and postal proof is not required by regulation.

    Example

    Layers enabled: Email (required). Subject receives email with OTP "A3K9X2MF" → enters code → case completes with "Verified (Digital)" assurance.

    Benchmark

    Completion time: 2-5 minutes. Success rate: 85-95%. Cost: lowest (no postal dispatch).

    Pro Tips

    • Best for: initial client onboarding, newsletter signups, low-risk KYC.
    • Can be stepped up to postal automatically if risk score is high.

    Standard Package

    Description

    Two-factor digital verification using both email OTP (8-character code) and SMS OTP (6-digit code). Both channels must be verified for the case to complete.

    Impact

    Assurance level: Verified (Digital). Provides dual-channel digital confirmation. Stronger than Basic but still does not prove physical address possession.

    Example

    Layers enabled: Email (required), SMS (required). Subject receives email OTP "A3K9X2MF" + SMS OTP "482917" → enters both → case completes.

    Benchmark

    Completion time: 3-10 minutes. Success rate: 80-90%. Cost: low (email + SMS, no postal).

    Pro Tips

    • Best for: standard KYC, regulated onboarding where dual digital verification is acceptable.
    • Requires valid phone number with country prefix (e.g. +44 for UK).

    Enhanced Package

    Description

    Full postal + digital verification. Sends email OTP and dispatches a tracked physical letter with a unique 10-character postal OTP and QR code. SMS is optional. The postal letter proves physical possession of the address.

    Impact

    Assurance level: Verified (Digital + Postal). Meets the strictest FCA, SRA, and HMRC requirements for proof of address. The gold standard for regulated industries.

    Example

    Layers enabled: Email (required), SMS (optional), Postal (required). Subject verifies email → letter arrives in 1-7 days → subject enters postal OTP → case completes.

    Benchmark

    Completion time: 3-10 days (depends on postal delivery). Success rate: 70-85%. Cost: medium (includes postal dispatch).

    Postal verification adds cost and time. Only use when regulatory requirements demand physical address proof.

    Pro Tips

    • Best for: law firms, financial services, accountancy firms, property transactions.
    • The QR code on the letter allows subjects to scan and verify instantly.

    Maximum Package

    Description

    Highest assurance. All four verification layers: email OTP (8-char), SMS OTP (6-digit), postal letter (10-char OTP + QR code), AND GPS geo-location capture when entering the postal code. Proves both mail receipt AND physical presence at the address.

    Impact

    Assurance level: Verified (Digital + Postal) with geo confirmation. The strongest possible proof that the subject physically resides at the claimed address.

    Example

    Layers: Email (required), SMS (required), Postal (required), Geo (required, 200m radius). Subject verifies email + SMS → receives letter → enters postal OTP while GPS confirms they're at the address.

    Benchmark

    Completion time: 3-10 days. Success rate: 60-75% (geo may fail if subject declines location). Cost: highest.

    Some subjects may decline location permissions. Configure geo as optional if you don't want to block these cases.

    Pro Tips

    • Best for: high-risk cases, AML/CFT compliance, fraud-prone scenarios, high-value property transactions.
    • Geo verification requires the subject to allow browser location access.

    Default Package

    Description

    The bundle marked as "Default" is automatically used when cases are created via the API without specifying a bundleId. Only one bundle can be the default at any time.

    Impact

    Controls the verification flow for API-created cases and any cases where the caseworker doesn't explicitly select a bundle.

    Example

    Set "Enhanced" as default → all API-created cases automatically use email + postal verification. Change to "Basic" → API cases only use email.

    Pro Tips

    • Set the default to your most commonly used package.
    • You can always override the default by specifying bundleId in the API request.

    Platform Package

    Description

    Pre-configured verification packages provided by Postal.id: Basic, Standard, Enhanced, and Maximum. These cannot be edited or deleted but can be set as the default.

    Impact

    Platform packages cover the most common verification scenarios. Create custom packages only if you need non-standard layer combinations.

    Example

    Platform packages: Basic (email only), Standard (email + SMS), Enhanced (email + SMS + postal), Maximum (all 4 layers). All are always available.

    Recipients

    Recipient

    Description

    A "recipient" (also called "subject") is the person whose address is being verified. Each recipient may have multiple verification cases if they've been verified at different addresses or re-verified over time.

    Impact

    Click any recipient to view their full profile including verification history, risk signals, address changes, and verification method success rates.

    Example

    Recipient "Jane Smith" has 3 cases: 1 completed (London address), 1 active (Manchester address), 1 failed (disposable email detected).

    Latest Status

    Description

    Shows the status of the most recent verification case for this recipient. Reflects where they are in the verification flow right now.

    Impact

    Quick indicator of whether the recipient's most recent verification is complete, in progress, or has issues.

    Example

    COMPLETE (green): latest case fully verified. POSTAL_DISPATCHED (amber): letter sent, awaiting delivery. FAILED (red): latest case failed.

    Cases Count

    Description

    Total number of verification cases ever created for this recipient across all addresses and time periods. Includes active, completed, failed, and expired cases.

    Impact

    Multiple cases may exist if the recipient moved, if a previous case expired, or if periodic re-verification is required.

    Example

    3 cases: means this person has been through the verification process 3 separate times (possibly at different addresses).

    Risk Score

    Description

    Aggregated risk percentage based on all risk signals detected for this recipient across all their cases. Combines ghost address, mail forwarding, address velocity, disposable email, and cross-tenant signals.

    Impact

    Red (>70%): High risk — investigate immediately. Amber (40-70%): Moderate risk — review recommended. Green (<40%): Low risk — no immediate action needed.

    Example

    15%: Low risk (no signals). 52%: Medium (disposable email detected). 85%: High (ghost address + cross-tenant + velocity).

    Formula

    Weighted average of all risk signals across all cases for this recipient.

    Pro Tips

    • Click through to the recipient profile for detailed signal breakdown.
    • High-risk recipients should have their completed cases reviewed.

    Recipient Search

    Description

    Search across name, email, phone number, and address fields. Filter by case status to find recipients at a specific verification stage. Sort by newest, oldest, name alphabetically, or most cases.

    Impact

    Quickly find specific recipients or identify groups of recipients in a particular state.

    Example

    Search "Manchester" → shows all recipients with Manchester addresses. Filter "FAILED" → shows recipients whose latest case failed.

    Recipient Profile

    Total Cases (Recipient)

    Description

    All verification cases ever created for this person, regardless of outcome. Includes active cases in progress, successfully completed cases, failed cases, and expired cases.

    Impact

    A high case count may indicate re-verifications (normal) or repeated failed attempts (investigate).

    Example

    5 total cases: 3 completed, 1 active, 1 expired.

    Active Cases

    Description

    Cases currently in progress — not yet reached a terminal state (COMPLETE, FAILED, or EXPIRED). These are cases where the subject still needs to complete one or more verification steps.

    Impact

    Active cases require monitoring. If a case stays active for too long, the subject may need a reminder.

    Example

    2 active cases: one at DIGITAL_PENDING (email OTP sent, awaiting entry), one at POSTAL_DISPATCHED (letter sent, awaiting delivery).

    Contact Details

    Description

    The subject's name, email address, and phone number as provided when the case was created. "First Seen" shows when this person was first added to the system. "Latest Status" shows their most recent case state.

    Impact

    Contact information is used for email OTP delivery (email) and SMS OTP delivery (phone). Tags help categorise recipients.

    Example

    Name: Jane Smith. Email: jane@example.com. Phone: +44 7700 900123. First Seen: 15 Jan 2026. Tags: VIP, Priority.

    Current Address

    Description

    The most recent address provided for verification. "Verified" with a date means postal verification was successfully completed for this address. Ghost Address and Forwarding badges indicate risk flags detected during address validation.

    Impact

    The current address is the one used for the latest or active verification case. Previous addresses appear in Address History.

    Example

    12 Baker Street, London, NW1 6XE, GB. Verified: 20 Feb 2026. Badges: none (clean address).

    Ghost Address badge means this is a known virtual office or mail forwarding address. Forwarding badge means mail may be redirected to a different location.

    Verification Methods

    Description

    Breakdown of how many email, SMS, and postal OTPs were sent to this recipient and how many were successfully verified. The progress bar shows the success rate for each channel.

    Impact

    Identifies which verification channels work best for this recipient. Low success on a channel may indicate delivery issues.

    Example

    Email: 3 sent, 3 verified (100%). SMS: 2 sent, 2 verified (100%). Postal: 2 sent, 1 verified (50%). Green bar (≥80%), Amber (50-79%), Red (<50%).

    Pro Tips

    • Low postal success may indicate address issues or subject disengagement.
    • Low email success may indicate spam filtering or invalid email.

    Address History

    Description

    Chronological list of all addresses this person has been verified at across all their cases. Each entry shows the full address, country flag, and whether verification was completed.

    Impact

    Useful for detecting frequent movers, address fraud patterns, or confirming legitimate address changes over time.

    Example

    1. 12 Baker Street, London — Verified 20 Feb 2026. 2. 45 Oxford Road, Manchester — Verified 15 Nov 2025. 3. PO Box 123, Bristol (Ghost badge) — Not verified.

    Case History

    Description

    All verification cases for this recipient in reverse chronological order. Click any Case ID to view the full case details including timeline, risk assessment, and evidence pack.

    Impact

    Complete audit trail of every verification attempt for this person. Useful for compliance reviews and dispute resolution.

    Example

    Case a1b2c3d4: COMPLETE, Verified (Digital + Postal), 12 Baker Street, 20 Feb 2026. Case e5f6g7h8: FAILED, --, 45 Oxford Road, 15 Nov 2025.

    Create Case

    Subject

    Description

    The person whose address is being verified. "Subject" is Postal.id terminology for the end-person — not your employee or team member. Provide their full legal name as it would appear at the address.

    Impact

    The subject's name is printed on the postal letter and included in the evidence pack. Use the correct legal name for compliance purposes.

    Example

    Input: "Jane Elizabeth Smith" (full legal name). Avoid nicknames or abbreviations unless that's the name at the address.

    Subject Contact

    Description

    Email is used for email OTP delivery (8-character code). Phone (with country prefix like +44 for UK, +1 for US) is used for SMS OTP delivery (6-digit code). Both are optional but required if the selected verification bundle includes email/SMS layers.

    Impact

    Without email, the email OTP layer cannot function. Without phone, the SMS OTP layer cannot function. Postal verification does not require either.

    Example

    Email: jane.smith@example.com. Phone: +447700900123 (UK mobile) or +12125551234 (US). Note: phone must include country prefix.

    Pro Tips

    • Validate email addresses before entry — disposable emails trigger risk signals.
    • Mobile numbers only — landlines cannot receive SMS.

    Consent

    Description

    Legal requirement (GDPR/data protection): you must confirm the subject has given consent for address verification before creating a case. This checkbox is mandatory — the case cannot be created without it.

    Impact

    Ensures compliance with data protection regulations. The consent status is recorded in the audit trail and included in the evidence pack.

    Example

    Check the box to confirm: "Subject has given consent for address verification". Unchecked = "Create Case" button is disabled.

    Creating cases without genuine subject consent may violate GDPR and expose your organisation to regulatory penalties.

    Address Validation

    Description

    After entering an address, the system automatically validates it for deliverability. Checks include: valid postal code format, known ghost/virtual office addresses, active mail forwarding/redirection services, and address standardisation.

    Impact

    Pre-dispatch validation prevents wasted postal costs on undeliverable addresses and flags risk signals early.

    Example

    Enter "12 Baker St, London" → validation returns: Deliverable (green tick), standardised to "12 Baker Street, London, NW1 6XE". Or: "71-75 Shelton Street" → Ghost Address warning (orange).

    Pro Tips

    • Accept suggested address corrections for better deliverability.
    • Ghost address warnings don't block case creation but do increase the risk score.

    Verification Package Selection

    Description

    Choose which verification bundle to use for this case. Each package defines which layers (email, SMS, postal, geo) are enabled and whether they're required or optional. "Default" badge means this is the bundle used for API-created cases. "Platform" badge means it's provided by Postal.id.

    Impact

    The selected package determines the verification flow, timeline, cost, and resulting assurance level.

    Example

    Select "Enhanced" → email OTP sent immediately, postal letter dispatched within 1 hour. Estimated postal cost shown below (e.g. £1.20 for UK letter).

    Pro Tips

    • Click the ? next to each package name (Basic, Standard, Enhanced, Maximum) for detailed explanations.
    • Required layers must pass; optional layers enhance assurance without blocking.

    Client Reference

    Description

    Optional internal reference for your own records. Use your matter ID, client number, file reference, or any identifier that helps you match this verification case to your internal systems.

    Impact

    Searchable in the case list and included in webhook payloads and evidence packs. Makes it easy to cross-reference with your practice management software.

    Example

    Examples: "MATTER-2024-001", "CLT-4521", "AML-REF-789", "Property-Sale-42-High-St". Any format up to 100 characters.

    Reverification & Score Decay

    Verification Score Decay

    Description

    Verification scores decay logarithmically over time using a half-life of ~180 days. The decay rate is 0.15, meaning scores erode quickly at first then slow down. A score never drops below 10% of its original value.

    Impact

    Decay reflects that proof of address becomes less reliable over time — people move, addresses change. Monitoring decay helps you plan re-verifications before scores become unreliable.

    Example

    A score of 85 at completion decays to ~72 after 180 days, ~63 after 360 days.

    Formula

    currentScore = originalScore × (1 − 0.15 × ln(1 + daysSince / 180))

    Pro Tips

    • Re-verify before the score drops below the 30-point acceptance threshold.
    • Re-verification resets the decay clock and updates the score to the new result.

    Reverification Date

    Description

    The anticipated date when the verification score will decay below the 30-point acceptance threshold. This is computed from the original score and the completion date using the logarithmic decay formula.

    Impact

    Plan re-verification before this date to maintain continuous, uninterrupted proof of address for your client. After this date, the Postal ID may no longer be accepted by other tenants.

    Example

    A case completed on 1 Jan 2026 with a score of 85 would have a reverification date around mid-2027.

    Days to Reverification

    Description

    The number of days remaining before the verification score drops below the acceptance threshold (30 points). Colour coded: green (>90 days), amber (30–90 days), red (<30 days), or "Overdue" if already past due.

    Impact

    Gives you an at-a-glance view of which cases need attention soon. Prioritise cases in red or amber for re-verification.

    Once overdue, the associated Postal ID may be rejected by other tenants querying it.

    Re-verification

    Description

    Creating a new verification case for the same person and address. This resets the decay clock, updates the Postal ID score to the new verification result, and increments the re-verification count.

    Impact

    Essential for maintaining long-term proof of address for ongoing client relationships. Each re-verification strengthens the Postal ID credential.

    Pro Tips

    • The Postal ID code (PID-XXXX-XXXX-XXXX) stays the same across re-verifications.
    • Re-verification uses the same verification layers as the original case.

    Admin Dashboard

    Total Tenants

    Description

    The total number of tenant organisations registered on the platform, including both active and disabled accounts.

    Impact

    Tracks platform adoption. Growth in tenant count indicates market traction.

    Benchmark

    Healthy platforms see steady month-over-month growth. A disabled tenant count above 20% may indicate onboarding or retention issues.

    Pro Tips

    • Click this card to view the full tenant list with filtering.
    • Disabled tenants still count towards the total but cannot create new cases.

    Total Users

    Description

    The total number of individual user accounts across all tenants, excluding soft-deleted users.

    Impact

    Indicates platform engagement depth. Multiple users per tenant suggests healthy adoption.

    Benchmark

    Average 2-5 users per tenant is typical for professional services firms.

    Pro Tips

    • Users include Tenant Admins, Caseworkers, and Auditors.
    • Click this card to navigate to the tenants list where you can see per-tenant user counts.

    Total Cases

    Description

    The all-time count of verification cases created across all tenants. Includes cases in all states: active, completed, failed, and expired.

    Impact

    The primary volume metric for the platform. Drives revenue and capacity planning.

    Formula

    Total Cases = sum of all cases across all tenants, regardless of status.

    Pro Tips

    • Click this card to view every case across all tenants.
    • Compare with Cases This Month to gauge current activity vs historical volume.

    Success Rate

    Description

    The percentage of all cases that reached COMPLETE status, calculated as Completed Cases / Total Cases.

    Impact

    The key quality metric. A low success rate may indicate issues with postal delivery, subject engagement, or verification flow usability.

    Benchmark

    Target 60-80% for a healthy platform. Below 50% warrants investigation into failure causes.

    Formula

    Success Rate = (COMPLETE cases / Total Cases) × 100

    Pro Tips

    • Click this card to see all completed cases.
    • Cross-reference with Failure Rate to identify whether failures are from expiry (subject disengagement) or hard failures (delivery issues).

    Cases This Month

    Description

    The number of cases created in the current calendar month. Compared against last month to show growth trend.

    Impact

    Tracks current platform activity and billing volume. A declining trend may indicate tenant churn.

    Pro Tips

    • Click this card to see only cases created this month.
    • The comparison figure shows last month's total for quick trend assessment.

    Active Cases

    Description

    Cases currently in progress — not yet completed, failed, or expired. Includes states: CREATED, DIGITAL_PENDING, DIGITAL_VERIFIED, POSTAL_DISPATCHED, POSTAL_PENDING, POSTAL_VERIFIED, and MANUAL_REVIEW.

    Impact

    Indicates current platform workload. A high number of active cases relative to completions may indicate bottlenecks.

    Pro Tips

    • Click this card to see all active cases filtered by non-terminal statuses.
    • Monitor for cases stuck in POSTAL_DISPATCHED for extended periods — may indicate delivery issues.

    Manual Reviews

    Description

    Cases that have been escalated to MANUAL_REVIEW status, requiring a human caseworker to make a verification decision.

    Impact

    Cases awaiting human decision. A growing queue indicates either increased risk signals or insufficient caseworker capacity.

    Cases in Manual Review are blocking — the subject cannot progress until a caseworker approves or rejects.

    Pro Tips

    • Click this card to see all cases pending manual review.
    • Common triggers: high risk score, ghost address detection, multiple failed attempts.

    Failure Rate

    Description

    The percentage of cases that ended in FAILED or EXPIRED status, calculated as (Failed + Expired) / Total Cases.

    Impact

    Indicates verification friction. High failure rates reduce platform value and tenant satisfaction.

    Benchmark

    Target below 30%. Above 40% requires investigation. Expired cases often indicate subject disengagement rather than system failure.

    Formula

    Failure Rate = (FAILED + EXPIRED cases / Total Cases) × 100

    Pro Tips

    • Click this card to see all failed and expired cases.
    • Differentiate between FAILED (hard failures like invalid address) and EXPIRED (subject never completed verification).

    Cases by Status

    Description

    A breakdown of all cases grouped by their current status, showing count and percentage for each state in the verification pipeline.

    Impact

    Provides a snapshot of where cases are in the funnel. Useful for identifying bottlenecks and throughput issues.

    Pro Tips

    • Click any status badge to drill down to cases in that specific state.
    • A healthy pipeline shows most cases in COMPLETE with small percentages in intermediate states.

    Top Tenants

    Description

    The top 10 tenants ranked by total case volume. Shows tenant name, billing plan, active/disabled status, and case count.

    Impact

    Identifies your highest-volume clients. These tenants drive most of the platform revenue and should receive priority support.

    Pro Tips

    • Click a tenant name to view their full detail page.
    • Monitor for concentration risk — if one tenant represents >50% of volume, diversification is needed.

    Admin Tenant Management

    Tenant

    Description

    A tenant is a corporate client organisation registered on Postal.id. Each tenant has their own users, cases, verification bundles, branding, and billing.

    Impact

    Tenants are the primary unit of multi-tenancy. All data is strictly isolated between tenants — a user in one tenant can never see another tenant's data.

    Pro Tips

    • Tenants self-register via the /try page or are created by a Platform Admin.
    • Each tenant gets a unique slug used in API keys and internal routing.

    Billing Plan

    Description

    The subscription tier assigned to a tenant: Trial (limited free cases), Starter, Professional, or Enterprise. Each plan defines case limits, feature access, and pricing.

    Impact

    Determines how many cases a tenant can create per period and which features are available.

    Benchmark

    Trial: 1-3 cases. Starter: 50/month. Professional: 500/month. Enterprise: unlimited.

    Pro Tips

    • Plan can be changed by a Platform Admin from the tenant detail page.
    • Tenants exceeding their plan limit receive a "Case limit reached" error.

    Tenant Status

    Description

    Whether a tenant account is Active or Disabled. Disabled tenants cannot log in or create new cases, but their existing data is preserved.

    Impact

    Disabling a tenant is a reversible action — it blocks access without deleting data. Used for non-payment, policy violations, or at tenant request.

    Disabling a tenant immediately prevents all their users from logging in. Active cases in progress will not complete.

    Pro Tips

    • Use the toggle button on the tenant detail page to enable/disable.
    • Disabled tenants still appear in reports and analytics.

    Tenant Users

    Description

    The number of user accounts within a tenant. Includes Tenant Admins (full access), Caseworkers (create/manage cases), and Auditors (read-only).

    Impact

    User count indicates how deeply a tenant has adopted the platform. More users generally means higher engagement.

    Pro Tips

    • View the team breakdown on the tenant detail page.
    • Pending invites (not yet accepted) are shown separately.

    Tenant Cases

    Description

    The total number of verification cases created by a tenant, broken down by status.

    Impact

    Case volume drives billing and indicates tenant engagement level.

    Pro Tips

    • Click through to see the full case breakdown by status on the tenant detail page.

    Toggle Tenant

    Description

    Enable or disable a tenant account. Only available to Platform Admins (not Support Agents).

    Impact

    Disabling blocks all login and case creation for that tenant. Enabling restores full access.

    This action takes effect immediately. All active sessions for the tenant's users will fail on their next request.

    Tenant Configuration

    Description

    The tenant's platform configuration including verification policy, branding (logo, colours), webhook settings, and API key management.

    Impact

    Configuration determines how the tenant's verification flow behaves — which channels are required, OTP expiry times, and assurance levels.

    Admin Operations

    Platform Settings

    Description

    Global platform configuration including rate limits (OTP attempts, API requests), default values (bundle, OTP expiry, evidence retention), feature flags, and maintenance mode.

    Impact

    Changes affect all tenants platform-wide. Rate limits protect against abuse. Feature flags control which capabilities are available.

    Only Platform Admins can modify settings. Support Agents have read-only access.

    Pro Tips

    • Feature flags can instantly enable/disable capabilities like geo verification or bulk upload across the entire platform.

    Provider Health

    Description

    Real-time health status of external service providers: postal (Lob, Stannp), email (Resend), SMS (Infobip/Twilio), and storage (S3). Each provider shows Healthy, Degraded, or Down status.

    Impact

    Provider health directly affects verification capability. A Down postal provider means letters cannot be dispatched in that region.

    Benchmark

    All providers should be Healthy. Degraded indicates elevated error rates. Down means the circuit breaker has tripped.

    Pro Tips

    • The circuit breaker automatically recovers — Down providers are probed periodically and restored when they respond successfully.
    • Check the API health page for detailed latency and error information.

    Webhook Delivery

    Description

    Monitoring for webhook event deliveries to tenant endpoints. Shows success rate, average response time, retry queue depth, and per-tenant health.

    Impact

    Failed webhooks mean tenants miss real-time notifications about case status changes. A growing retry queue indicates endpoint issues.

    Benchmark

    Target >95% webhook delivery success rate. Average response time should be under 2 seconds.

    Pro Tips

    • Filter by tenant to investigate specific delivery issues.
    • Webhooks retry up to 5 times with exponential backoff.

    Audit Log

    Description

    Immutable, append-only record of all significant platform events: case creation, status changes, user logins, settings modifications, evidence downloads, and security events.

    Impact

    The audit log is the compliance backbone. Regulators and auditors rely on it to verify that verification processes were followed correctly.

    Audit records cannot be modified or deleted. This is by design for compliance.

    Pro Tips

    • Filter by tenant, action type, or date range to investigate specific events.
    • Security events (failed logins, permission changes) are highlighted for quick identification.

    Recipients Search

    Description

    Cross-tenant search across all verified subjects (recipients). Supports search by name, email, or case number, plus bulk search for multiple values at once.

    Impact

    Enables support agents to quickly find any recipient across the entire platform when handling queries.

    Pro Tips

    • Use Bulk Search mode to paste multiple names or case numbers and find all matches at once.
    • Sort by any column header to reorder results.
    • Subject names and emails are encrypted at rest and decrypted only for display.

    API Health

    Description

    Detailed health monitoring for each external API provider. Shows latency, success rate, circuit breaker state, endpoint documentation, and last error.

    Impact

    Provides visibility into third-party dependencies. Useful for diagnosing delivery failures or slow verification times.

    Pro Tips

    • Click a provider card for detailed endpoint documentation.
    • Latency spikes may indicate provider-side issues — check their status pages.

    Support Agent Role

    Description

    A read-only platform role for postal.id employees who handle customer support. Support Agents can view all admin data (tenants, cases, recipients, audit logs) but cannot modify settings, toggle tenants, or change configurations.

    Impact

    Enables customer support without the risk of accidental configuration changes.

    Pro Tips

    • Support Agents see the same dashboard and data as Platform Admins.
    • The Settings tab is hidden from Support Agents.
    • Write operations return a 403 Forbidden error if attempted via API.

    Maintenance Mode

    Description

    When enabled, all tenant portals display a maintenance message instead of normal content. Only Platform Admins can enable/disable maintenance mode from Platform Settings.

    Impact

    Use during planned deployments or infrastructure changes. Prevents tenants from encountering errors during updates.

    Maintenance mode blocks ALL tenant access immediately. Only use when necessary and communicate the expected duration.